| | | Forum Newbie
       
Group: Forum Members Last Login: 1/1/2008 1:09:53 PM Posts: 1, Visits: 3 |
| I’ll get straight to the point - A couple of hours ago, evidence was discovered (via facebook) that one of our adult youth group leaders had participated in a meal with some students in our youth group. Through pictures of this activity, it was also discovered that alcohol was consumed at some point during the evening out. The country I am serving in has a drinking age of 18. The adult leader within this outing was of age, as were many of the handful of students who were also there. We also know, however, that a number of the students were not of age. My current role within the youth leadership is fairly limited… I am officially employed in another area of ministry within the church, but have been assigned (for the time being) administrative responsibilities to the group (budgeting, etc.) I know what my personal response would be in this situation (and I would hope that the church leadership ultimately agrees!) I realize that what happens is ultimately up to the leadership of this church. That being said, however, here are the 4 questions I would pose to those who are more experienced in situations like this. I ask them not to go in with “ammunition” for my own opinions or stances in this case, but so I might have a better understanding of both sides of the issue before I bring it to the attention of other church leadership: 1) What action, if any, should the church consider taking against the adult leader? 2) What action, if any, should the church consider taking against those who were of legal drinking age? (Not from a legal point-of-view, but from a church "discipline" point-of-view). 3) What action, if any, should the church consider taking against those who were not of legal drinking age? (same side note as above). 4) What advice would you give in relation to informing and communicating with the parents of the students (both of age and underage) about the situation? I know other churches have had to sort out and deal with situations like this one in the past, so I eagerly look forward to any advice you might have for us in this situation. If there’s any additional considerations you would suggest, please include those as well… thanks, everyone! |
| | | | 
Forum Expert
       
Group: Forum Members Last Login: 8/25/2008 1:52:34 PM Posts: 2,250, Visits: 9,830 |
| chris247i (1/1/2008) ... 1) What action, if any, should the church consider taking against the adult leader? 2) What action, if any, should the church consider taking against those who were of legal drinking age? (Not from a legal point-of-view, but from a church "discipline" point-of-view). 3) What action, if any, should the church consider taking against those who were not of legal drinking age? (same side note as above). 4) What advice would you give in relation to informing and communicating with the parents of the students (both of age and underage) about the situation? Chris, I am sure, well at least I pray, that you will get wise and experienced answers to your questions. But from a practical and ministerial point of view let me begin by advising you to continue praying specifically for this situation. Does the church leadership know already? Are you the one presenting the church with the evidence? Have those who are "presumably" guilty been confronted yet? Before any action is taken they need to be allowed the opportunity to explain the situation and give an account. This is very serious considering that the one responsible for leading by example has abused/neglected his calling. If/when this is confirmed, confessed and forgiven then I believe the youth leader should be held responsible by publicly asking for forgiveness from his youth group. He/She should be able to acknowledge his/her wrongdoing and demonstrate remorse. If not, then the consequence is clear. The leader should also be given the opporunity to suggest what he/she thinks should be the discipline administered. I believe they should be mature enough to accept a "sabbatical". Second, those of legal drinking age should also be held accountable by also repenting to the group. Thirdly, while those under the drinking age should have known better, I believe they should just be admonished strongly (with biblical support). As far as the parents are concerned, the church leadership IS responsible of communicating this to them immediately after it has been confirmed and discussed with them. I realize that many will think that discipline is up to the parents, but as ministers and leaders we have a responsibility and will be held accountable by God if we do not take action and administer godly discipline (when needed) to those under our care. Therefore, I believe informing the church leadership and having them take disciplinary action precedes informing the parents. Remember, there may be some parents who might think that this is not such a big deal. In God's eyes however, it's a different story. I pray this helps some. I'll be praying for you and this situation.

 |
| | | | 
Forum Expert
       
Group: Forum Members Last Login: 5/18/2008 1:36:50 AM Posts: 276, Visits: 6,756 |
| | In your quest to understanding both sides, I would ask what is culturally acceptable in that country as regards to drinking during a meal? Is it common place for the adults to have a drink? If so, this could have been something that the adults and older students over 18 ordered without thought of their position with the other students? Sometimes those who are "college age" will have a drink just because they can? Have you seen the evidence? Did the drinking look "casual" or was there definate inappropriate use of and attention made to the alcohol? Was this a meal that turned into a drinking party? You state that this was a meal but do not state if the drinking continued after the meal. If this was a drink ordered with the meal in a place that is common for adults to do so and no unusual attention drawn to the drink, then a warning may be more appropriate than a discipline. Talk to those who were legal age and letting them know that it is not acceptable to drink at any time when out with a youth group and representing the church. This could have been just a mistake and once they realize what they did, they will understand why they should not have. Watch the "evidence" with them to point out student's reactions to their leader drinking. Ask the youth leader which students at the meal were 18 years old. He may not have been aware that someone was not yet 18? Some 16 and 17 year olds will accept a drink when offered. However, if there was joking around the drink and offering it to those not of age (in other words, a "drinking party"), then a higher level of discipline is in order. Part of the discipline may be that all those of legal age attend a class on alchol. I would also find out what the intention of the filmmaker was who put this on facebook. What was that person's role in the evening? If this was not a "drinking party", why would the meal be filmed and published on facebook? In any case, I would ask the adult leader that night to personally approach each parent and apologize for drinking in their child's presence. It is good that you are looking at the whole picture and not just reacting to your first impressions. I pray that you will find the fair and just answer in whatever you discover and decide.
- Adrianne
 |
| | | | 
Forum Expert
       
Group: Forum Members Last Login: 8/25/2008 1:52:34 PM Posts: 2,250, Visits: 9,830 |
| ADRIANNE B. (1/2/2008)
...If this was a drink ordered with the meal in a place that is common for adults to do so and no unusual attention drawn to the drink, then a warning may be more appropriate than a discipline. Talk to those who were legal age and letting them know that it is not acceptable to drink at any time when out with a youth group and representing the church. This could have been just a mistake and once they realize what they did, they will understand why they should not have. If this is what actually happened (must be confirmed) I am concerned with the idea that it could have been a "mistake" of the leader. First, if the church teaches abstinence from alcohol then it should be something the leader is aware of. Second, the fact that underage students were present should've prompted the leader to set an example by observing the law in front of them. Romans 14:20 I am sure this includes drinks as well. However, if there was joking around the drink and offering it to those not of age (in other words, a "drinking party"), then a higher level of discipline is in order. Part of the discipline may be that all those of legal age attend a class on alcohol. I agree wholeheartedly, but hold to the conviction that there should have been no drinks at all IF it is against the church's teachings. The leader could've/should've declined the drinks. If alcohol consumption IS NOT prohibited the leader along with those of age still acted irresponsibly by drinking in front of the younger crowd. Therefore should be held accountable as I stated in my first post.

 |
| | | | 
Forum Newbie
       
Group: Forum Members Last Login: 1/5/2008 6:45:52 PM Posts: 5, Visits: 28 |
| Greetings,
I am going to start by not addressing your questions specifically. Drinking alcoholic beverages is not a new practice on earth and obviously the attitudes vary widely toward it in society. Some Christian sects and denominations allow drinking and others do not, nearly all of secular society allows drinking and in some countries this starts in childhood. Why say all of this? So I can remind people of this, what is culturally acceptable is irrelevant. The church is called out from society to live a moral and better lifestyle, how that is defined varies from sect to sect, denomination to denomination and sometimes building to building. I am not looking to debate whether or not it should vary only to say that if there is a factor to be considered it is not one of society and culture but of faith and doctrine.
Now about your questions specifically and under the mode, primarily, that this was a bad act.
1) What action, if any, should the church consider taking against the adult leader?
I believe this is the starting point but I do not believe it starts with action. You have seen pictures and your posting implies no conversation with the leader as yet seeking clarity - it does seem to imply that you know with certainty that minors were consuming alcohol at this event. The full truth is needed (to ones best ability to ascertain it) to levy action. Even an adulterer would have gotten a trial two thousand years ago. What did happen does affect the needed action. At least if the consumption of alcohol is doctrinally wrong for your church then this person must be removed from a position of leadership completely.
2) What action, if any, should the church consider taking against those who were of legal drinking age? (Not from a legal point-of-view, but from a church "discipline" point-of-view).
For those youth who were of legal drinking age, counseling is appropriate. That is it, and that need not be "Church Discipline." In most cases that term is reserved for actions taken against a member as a result of the matter being disclosed before the congregation during a service and the members voting to censure a member. A young adult who drinks is more likely poorly taught than willingly acting out against the church. Proper counseling about the churches stance on temperance and the possible outcomes of contributing to the delinquency of a minor is the place I would start on any such case.
3) What action, if any, should the church consider taking against those who were not of legal drinking age? (same side note as above).
The same actions as above. The youth need to be taught carefully and as so many Christians have developed an attitude that "If culture is doing it I can do it," the church leadership can not assume that these youth actually know better. In fact they have very probably been taught not to be judgmental, that they will be saved regardless of their actions and that you can do all and act as all as long as you pray at the end. I know it is hard to think that your church could teach this, it may likely not. These kids have many influences in their lives and much of the world today that claims to be Christian is not, they see this, hear it, and live it. Do not underestimate the outside influences in their lives.
4) What advice would you give in relation to informing and communicating with the parents of the students (both of age and underage) about the situation?
First you counsel the youth, then the parents, then both. The parents need to be informed and they need to sit through the same counseling their kids do (as a group). In part so they know what the church is doing to help correct the behavior, in balance because they may be in the same state their kids are. Finally, an interactive, workshop style meeting of the entire group to cover temperance is in order. This brings two sides (parents and youth) to the same neutral ground and helps them to work together through the issues and stigma related to the problem.
In most matters of failure like this the problem is rarely so narrow as the act. The problem is almost always a lack of understanding of what a Christian lifestyle is and the expectation (doctrine) of the church. Many church almost completely fail to teach doctrine others seem to have none. The book of Galatians is helpful in this as this letter about freedom and the law struggles with the issue of worldly living and LAW (this is more than Mosaic/Levitical law, at this time it is Rabbinic Law what will become the Mishnah and if you are not familiar with it, it is worth a deeper understanding and offers great insight into the world of law Paul and Jesus lived in). Galatians ends explaining just what a Christian lifestyle is founded on and will be helpful for you in this matter.
God Bless,
Christopher Fishell
Xtreme Youth Resources International
God Bless,
Christopher Fishell
Executive Director
Xtreme Youth Resources International |
| | | | 
Forum Expert
       
Group: Forum Members Last Login: 5/18/2008 1:36:50 AM Posts: 276, Visits: 6,756 |
| | I agree that absolutley no matter the situation, there should be no alcoholic drinking in a church event (espcially with minors) even if the church allows alcohol in moderation. I agree that the adult leader needs to be asked about this and held accountable. The first post asked for understanding on both sides and I was giving a "possible" view point of the "other" side. I was just looking for ways to help "understand" what happened. Not that I supported or was looking for excuses. What happened absolutely should not have and was wrong no matter what evidence is brought forward. "Mistake" may not have been the best word to use but may be a word the leader will use? My answer also for some reason assumed that the adult leader was of "college" age putting the leader very close to the same age group of the students. I realized later that I could be wrong in that area and if so, my view point would have been much harsher. I automatically pictured a group of everyone being close to the same age which would be older teens and college age people. Though it shouldn't be easy for any adult leader regardless of age to "fall into" these situations, something happened to cause this serious error in judgement. Both Pastor Joe's and Chris's input of what should be done sound reasonable. I believe accountability is in order in this situation. I believe people need to face the consequences and be accountable for their actions. At the same time we realize we are all human and whenever possible need the opportunity to learn from our actions and make the decision not to let this happen again (counseling). I also recognize that there are serious situations where second chances can not be given (at least not right away) so maybe removal of the youth leader postition may be needed. Only those who obtain the entire evidence (who, what and why) will be able to make that call based on the adult leader's answers to the evidence. I feel that the right thing will be done. Usually whenever someone asks for input (view points) and understanding, they are willing to consider all the sides when deciding the solutions that are best for each person involved.
- Adrianne
 |
| |
|
|